Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT


Wireless mesh networking: ZigBee vs DigiMesh

6 August 2008 Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT

Mesh networking is a powerful way to route data. Range is extended by allowing data to hop node to node and reliability is increased by ‘self healing’, the ability to create alternate paths when one node fails or a connection is lost.

One popular mesh networking protocol is ZigBee, which is specifically designed for low-data rate, low-power applications. Digi International offers several products based on ZigBee. Additionally, the company has developed an alternate mesh protocol named DigiMesh. Both ZigBee and DigiMesh offer unique advantages important to different applications, as this article considers.

ZigBee nodes

The ZigBee protocol defines three types of nodes: coordinators, routers and end device, with a requirement of one coordinator per network - see Figure 1.

Figure 1. A typical ZigBee network
Figure 1. A typical ZigBee network

While all nodes can send and receive data, there are differences in the specific roles they play.

Coordinators are the most capable of the three node types. There is exactly one coordinator in each network and it is the device that establishes the network originally. It is able to store information about the network, including security keys.

Routers act as intermediate nodes, relaying data from other devices.

End devices can be low-power/battery-powered devices. They have sufficient functionality to talk to their parents (either the coordinator or a router) and cannot relay data from other devices. This reduced functionality allows for the potential to reduce their cost.

ZigBee offers these advantages:

* Open standard with interoperability between vendors.

* Option for lower cost, reduced function end nodes.

DigiMesh nodes

DigiMesh has only one node type. As an homogenous network, all nodes can route data and are interchangeable - see Figure 2. There are no parent-child relationships. All can be configured as low-power/battery powered devices.

Figure 2. A typical DigiMesh network
Figure 2. A typical DigiMesh network

DigiMesh offers these advantages:

* Network setup is simpler.

* More flexibility to expand the network.

* Increased reliability in environments where routers may come and go due to interference or damage.

Sleeping routers

Allowing a node to sleep reduces power consumption, which is especially helpful for nodes that are battery powered. Currently, ZigBee allows for end devices to sleep but not routers or coordinators. DigiMesh allows all nodes to sleep, thereby increasing battery life.

Sleeping is allowed by time synchronisation. Some systems require a gateway or coordinator to establish time synchronisation. A significant advantage of DigiMesh is that it eliminates the single point of failure associated with relying on a coordinator or gateway. Instead, it establishes time synchronisation through a nomination and election process, enabling the network to operate autonomously.

Additional differences

Since ZigBee is an open standard, it offers the potential for interoperability with devices made by different vendors. This provides the ability to have over-the-air firmware updates. Furthermore, ZigBee offers established profiles for common applications such as energy management and lighting controls. A good selection of diagnostic support tools, like RF packet sniffers, is also available.

Table 1. Comparison between ZigBee and DigiMesh
Table 1. Comparison between ZigBee and DigiMesh

DigiMesh, as a proprietary protocol, allows for tighter control of code space and therefore more room for growth in features. It is available on platforms with longer range and more RF data rate options. Frame payload is generally larger, which can improve throughput for applications that send larger data blocks. Additionally, DigiMesh uses a simplified addressing method, which improves network setup and troubleshooting.





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Macom targets broadband radar with time delay MMIC
RFiber Solutions Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
Macom’s MADU FR1012 is a GaAs MMIC 1-bit true time delay device covering 4 GHz to 12 GHz, designed for broadband microwave systems where beam accuracy and signal integrity are critical.

Read more...
Compact analogue phase shifter
RF Design Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
The Mini-Circuits JSPHS-150+ is a compact analogue voltage-controlled phase shifter designed for narrowband RF applications between 100 and 150 MHz.

Read more...
Wireless connectivity expanded
iCorp Technologies Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
Espressif Systems has introduced two new members of its ESP32 wireless SoC family: the ESP32-E22, the company’s first Wi-Fi 6E connectivity chip, and the ESP32-H21, an ultra-low-power Bluetooth LE microcontroller aimed at coin-cell and battery-powered devices.

Read more...
Integrated X-band radar front-end module
RF Design Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
Qorvo has introduced an X-band radar front-end solution that enables defence system designers to achieve higher performance without increasing size, weight or prime power.

Read more...
Introducing Aurata
CST Electronics Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
Antenova has launched Aurata SR4L112: a compact, high efficiency embedded 4G/LTE antenna engineered for long, narrow PCB designs.

Read more...
Multi-constellation GNSS module in a legacy-compatible footprint
Altron Arrow Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
Telit Cinterion has announced the SE869eK2L, a single-frequency L1 GNSS module designed to help device manufacturers upgrade legacy positioning designs with improved performance and cost efficiency, while preserving design continuity.

Read more...
Quectel expands 5G portfolio
iCorp Technologies Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
Quectel expands 5G portfolio with new Qualcomm- and UNISOC-based modules.

Read more...
Compact RTK design: More than just the receiver
iCorp Technologies Editor's Choice Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
In practice, engineers building compact RTK products keep discovering the same thing: the hardest component in the system is no longer the receiver. It is the antenna.

Read more...
Microchip advances Space-Grade timing performance
ASIC Design Services Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
Microchip Technology has expanded its atomic clock portfolio with the radiation-tolerant Space CSAC-SA65, a Chip Scale Atomic Clock designed to deliver precise timing for space systems.

Read more...
Channel emulator for 6 G and Wi-Fi 7/8
Concilium Technologies Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
With 400 MHz instantaneous bandwidth and support for carrier frequencies up to 23,6 GHz, Vertex 6.0 is the industry’s first channel emulator designed for next generation 6 G and Wi-Fi 7/8 testing.

Read more...









While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd | All Rights Reserved