Test & Measurement


iOLM technology eases FTTx/PON network testing

23 January 2013 Test & Measurement

Of the current test methods for testing FTTx (Fibre to the ‘x’, with x being a placeholder for various end-points) and PON (passive optical network) installations, OLTS, using an optical loss test set (optical power meter and light source) to characterise a link is easy; however it has one major limitation: it cannot locate the problems on the link. Furthermore, an OLTS requires two units and two technicians, thus increasing OPEX.

Figure 1. End-to-end test with a pair of OLTS units. This method may be fast, but will not locate the problem on the link.
Figure 1. End-to-end test with a pair of OLTS units. This method may be fast, but will not locate the problem on the link.

The most popular test method during construction and in certifying FTTX/PON installations is an OTDR (optical time domain reflectometer). A well trained and skilled optical technician can identify and locate problems on a link, using multiple acquisitions with different OTDR test settings and after various manual OTDR trace comparisons.

Figure 2. Incomplete OTDR test results on a 1x32 PON due to improper testing parameters set by a technician who is lacking OTDR testing experience.
Figure 2. Incomplete OTDR test results on a 1x32 PON due to improper testing parameters set by a technician who is lacking OTDR testing experience.

The shift from copper to fibre and the explosion of fibre deployments has created a shortage of skilled and experienced technicians. Combine this with budget constraints, lack of credible training facilities, practical experience and the result is an increased risk of improper testing, misdiagnoses, unusable OTDR results and repeat repairs/truck rolls.

Figure 3. Portable test setup with launch and receive fibres for a PON-line certification with a 1x32 splitter.
Figure 3. Portable test setup with launch and receive fibres for a PON-line certification with a 1x32 splitter.

The complexity of a PON/FTTx network requires skilled optical technicians to set different acquisition parameters on the OTDR to get the required information. Single OTDR measurement and auto test settings on today’s OTDRs are incapable of fully characterising this type of network.

To overcome this limitation, skilled technicians perform multiple additional acquisitions on the OTDR with other parameters to fully characterise the link.

Figure 4. Example of test results. All the information, including diagnostics, is provided in a single view.
Figure 4. Example of test results. All the information, including diagnostics, is provided in a single view.

Portable applications

EXFO’s new test solution is an ‘intelligent’ OTDR. Essentially it is a software application that runs on the test unit that is able to set and take multiple and variable acquisitions, then analyse the information to generate a detailed linear diagram about every element on the link, in a single-button operation, providing maximum simplicity for expert-level link characterisation.

This new test method makes every technician a fibre-optics expert, whether they are testing in the field or from the central office. Plus, it does not require the parameter settings used in traditional OTDR testing, which means no distance, pulse width or averaging time setting with detection threshold setting required.

iOLM (intelligent Optical Link Mapper) technology stems from the need to create optimal testing technology for PON networks, as this is the most challenging network to test because of its short link lengths and many closely spaced elements, such as splices, connectors and splitters.

As shown in Table 1, the maximum IL difference between iOLM and the reference method (PM/LS) is 0,64 dB, which compares favourably to the OLTS method. Based on the PM/LS and the OLTS results, an experienced technician could have suspected a macrobend on the line because the difference in loss is more than 1 dB between 1310 and 1550 nm.

Table 1. IL test results from the different methods.
Table 1. IL test results from the different methods.

However, he would have no clue as to the location of the macrobend. He could therefore use an OTDR and a different combination of pulse widths to find the macrobend himself. With iOLM any technician will be able to clearly see that there is a macrobend immediately after the splitter (see Figure 5 showing a test conducted from ONT to OLT).

Figure 5. Image showing the position of a macrobend once analysed by a portable OTDR with multi-pulse acquisition and analysis capabilities.
Figure 5. Image showing the position of a macrobend once analysed by a portable OTDR with multi-pulse acquisition and analysis capabilities.

The test method is a one-end, single-unit testing method with the ability to provide clear diagnostics and discovered elements in a single view.

Comparing ORL measurements (Table 2), the maximum difference between the ORL meter and iOLM is 0,84 dB, which is small enough to locate any ORL problem.

Table 2. Table showing the different ORL test results.
Table 2. Table showing the different ORL test results.

So what is causing an ORL issue on the line?

This is caused by connector reflectance, but according to the ORL results, we are below the 32 dB threshold. Now, if we look at the results in Figure 6, we can see that there is one highly reflective connector that needs to be fixed (exceeds the -55 dB threshold).

Figure 5. Image showing the position of a macrobend once analysed by a portable OTDR with multi-pulse acquisition and analysis capabilities.
Figure 5. Image showing the position of a macrobend once analysed by a portable OTDR with multi-pulse acquisition and analysis capabilities.

This is what we are looking for when testing with an ORL meter (or OLTS) in both directions. We want to know the direction of the high ORL because that is where the high reflective connector is. Obviously, we would have missed it with the ORL meter or the OLTS, providing a clear advantage for the iOLM.

For more information contact Chris Nel, Lambda Test Equipment, +27 (0)12 349 1341, chris@lambdatest.co.za, www.lambdatest.co.za



Credit(s)



Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

New range of Tektronix DSOs
30 June 2020, Comtest , Test & Measurement
Comtest has released Tektronix’s new TBS2000B series of digital storage oscilloscopes (DSOs) that was developed to meet the performance, usability and affordability needs of both engineers and educators. ...

Read more...
Contactless ESD testing and access control unit
30 June 2020, Actum Group , Test & Measurement
In the electronics manufacturing industry, an electrostatic discharge (ESD) can cause irreparable damage to electronic components. This micro-lightning bolt can burn holes through insulating layers and ...

Read more...
How are IR cameras calibrated and how does ambient temperature affect readings?
30 June 2020, Instrotech , Test & Measurement
Infrared thermometers are calibrated with the help of reference radiation sources, so-called ‘black bodies’. These radiant sources are able to produce different temperatures with a high stability.  ...

Read more...
Thermal monitor for fever screening
30 June 2020, Actum Group , Test & Measurement
The TCSF256 thermal monitor from Actum Group is a fully automated, plug-and-play fever screening unit. It adopts an infrared radiation measurement technique that can measure body temperature by non-contact ...

Read more...
Uncover EMI issues early with simple pre-compliance tests
30 June 2020, Concilium Technologies , Test & Measurement
An effective pre-compliance testing methodology will reduce test cycle times, which ultimately impacts a company’s bottom line.

Read more...
The promise of 5G wireless communications
30 June 2020, Lambda Test , Test & Measurement
The deployment of 5G services worldwide is driving a massive increase in fibre densification for the required fronthaul and backhaul links interconnecting radio base stations and web-scale core packet networks.

Read more...
Phase noise analyser for precision oscillator characterisation
29 April 2020, Altron Arrow , Test & Measurement
To help research and manufacturing engineers make precise and accurate measurement of frequency signals, including those generated by atomic clocks and other high-performance frequency reference modules ...

Read more...
Ethernet tap for IO Ninja
25 March 2020, RF Design , Test & Measurement
Monitoring network communications of your PC can be accomplished without any specialised hardware – just use the Pcap Sniffer plugin of IO Ninja. The task of tapping into the Ethernet traffic of a non-PC ...

Read more...
Bench-top vector signal generator
29 April 2020, RFiber Solutions , Test & Measurement
The T3267E series bench-top vector signal generator from Transcom Instruments has excellent radio frequency performance and rich signal generating function. It can provide arbitrary wave, continuous ...

Read more...
Tektronix and Coherent Solutions partner for fully integrated optical comms
25 March 2020, Comtest , Test & Measurement
Comtest has announced that technology companies Tektronix and Coherent Solutions have an exclusive partnership agreement to provide fully integrated optical communications platforms to new and existing ...

Read more...