Editor's Choice

Why you don’t take ‘touch’ for granted

30 September 2020 Editor's Choice

The key criteria for choosing the right sensor control IC

Adilson Jacob.

Touch has become an incredibly intuitive way for people to interact with high-tech devices. In just a few short years after the first smartphones hit the shelves, it seems the whole world is happily tapping, swiping, pinching and flicking on phones and tablets, in stores, at work, and on the road. We expect every response to be precise and instant, as cool and glassy smooth as the surface of the device itself.

What factors should I consider when designing a touch user interface?

Designers know that this is not always easy to achieve. The processes involved with creating and measuring the capacitance changes that describe the type and location of each touch on the screen are subject to numerous challenges such as electrical noise both inside and outside the system, humidity in the environment, and unintentional user gestures close to the screen.

On the other hand, ensuring electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of the end product is especially challenging for equipment that contains a touchscreen. Whereas passing EMC testing calls for immunity to external electrical disturbances, the touchscreen relies on detecting and measuring disturbances to interpret the user’s wishes.

Achieving great touch sensitivity and fast response, while preventing unwanted signals causing spurious responses, calls for careful engineering.

Why is touch performance difficult to optimise?

Unfortunately, after many cumulative man-years of touchscreen development experience, there is no ‘default setting’, no universal parameters that can be simply programmed to make the touchscreen of an embedded project just work. Every system is different: there are multiple touchscreen technologies such as glass-film or glass-glass construction with single or double ITO (SITO/DITO) layers; the size of the screen and the cover-lens material and thickness influence touch response; and designers may have only a limited notion of the environment in which the screen will be used – whether outdoors or indoors, whether there will be high humidity or likelihood of water splashes, or other potential sources of interference.

The interactions between the display and the touch controller are critical to ensuring a great touch experience for the user. It’s probably fair to say that most projects consider the touch display before the controller. The concept for the product is often predominantly about look and feel, and the display size is often determined by application constraints, as are decisions about the cover-lens, such as the thickness, glass or polycarbonate, any vandal-resistant treatments, and anti-glare/anti-reflective coating.

How should I choose a touch controller?

With so many decisions already made or difficult to change, the challenge to identify and integrate a suitable touch controller – and optimise the firmware – can demand specialist skills and expertise.

Typical touch control chips on the market today are microcontroller-based ICs that integrate circuitry needed to stimulate the sensor and capture measurable responses. This typically includes a high-voltage charge pump controller, regulator, and multi-channel capacitance-to-digital converter that takes care of driving and sensing the capacitive-touch electrodes.

Not one shoe size fits all

Selecting the right touch IC to enhance your product’s performance cannot be a generic process. It needs to be as individual as each customer and tailored to their particular product’s application needs. This level of service doesn’t cost the earth. It is certainly not as costly as selecting the wrong touch IC, starting the whole design process again, or failing EMC testing.

Too often companies are having to take corrective action. In all instances they have actually added cost by extending their development time, doubling resources and investing twice, and not entering the market as quickly as intended.

Selecting the best controller for a given application can depend on factors such as cost and availability as well as performance. At Anders, we have experience with various types of controllers from several vendors, spanning a wide price/performance spectrum. A low-cost controller can often be tuned to deliver satisfactory performance, particularly with small display sizes and when the operating environment is relatively benign. With increasing display size, and as the electrical and electromagnetic environment becomes more challenging, a higher-performing controller is usually needed to achieve a suitable balance of signal detection and noise rejection to ensure robust and reliable touch detection in all operating conditions.

Table 1 shows an example of two very differing applications and the requirements for the touch IC.

Table 1. Touch IC requirements for two different applications.

Bolstering the familiarity that comes with the experience of working with various types of controllers on a wide range of customers’ projects, our preferred suppliers often present training workshops to introduce new products. These provide a valuable source of hands-on practice with the latest devices and techniques for touch optimisation. This way, we continue to expand the range of tools at our disposal to help make your touchscreen perform at its best.

The new product you’re developing right now is in demand and looks amazing, just as you designed it. Great touch is a critical part of the user-experience mix but can be the toughest aspect to solve.

Although not easy, with the right help you can get there. Let’s start the conversation.

For more information visit www.andersdx.com

Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Intel Agilex FPGAs deliver flexibility and agility for the data-centric world
26 May 2021, Altron Arrow , Editor's Choice, Programmable Logic
The Agilex FPGA fabric and innovative chiplet architecture delivers an extensible FPGA platform that scales across a wide range of device densities and brings key features and benefits to the table.

Preparing for a 5G world
26 May 2021 , Editor's Choice
The 5G network will be able to slice flexibly parallel connections, sized to best fit the level of service users request, and offer the best cost/performance compromise.

Reliable grounding methods for high-voltage power supplies
26 May 2021, Vepac Electronics , Editor's Choice, Power Electronics / Power Management
Proper ground connections between a power supply, AC mains input and the application’s load are essential for stable, reliable operation, but for HV (high voltage) supplies this is even more crucial. ...

From the editor’s desk: The continued relevance of Moore’s Law in the IoT age
26 May 2021, Technews Publishing , News, Editor's Choice
The end of Moore’s Law (which famously posits that the number of transistors in a dense IC doubles about every two years, assuming an optimal price/performance ratio) has repeatedly been predicted, yet ...

How do fusion splicers work?
26 February 2021, Lambda Test , Editor's Choice
Fibre-optic fusion splicers are highly accurate machines which are able to automatically align and join fibre-optic cores with sub-micron accuracy.

The current state of GaN use for RF technology
26 February 2021, RF Design , Editor's Choice, Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
Challenges for predicting the growth and penetration of GaN technology in certain markets come from the extent of the research and development being invested in.

Modern LIDAR systems promise sensing for every industry
26 February 2021, Altron Arrow , Editor's Choice, Opto-Electronics
As is always the case in human endeavours, it is impossible to know exactly what creative and useful ways people will come up with to use technology such as LIDAR.

Personality profile: Bossie Coetzer
26 February 2021, Rugged Interconnect Technologies , Editor's Choice, News
“Understanding product knowledge is power. I started reading any magazine that was available with articles discussing embedded products, including microprocessor technologies and bus architectures.”

From the editor’s desk: We’re still just circling the problem of e-waste
28 April 2021, Technews Publishing , News, Editor's Choice
Until we have many more recycling points and, ideally, weekly pickups like we do with paper recycling, most South Africans are probably just not going to bother.

Personality profile: Renato Martins
28 April 2021, Altron Arrow , Editor's Choice
“Spending more locally will create jobs, which in turn will have more people paying taxes, which in turn will create more opportunities.”