Editor's Choice


A guide to manual cleaning of PCB assemblies

10 October 2018 Editor's Choice Manufacturing / Production Technology, Hardware & Services

Manual cleaning of soldering residues can be inconsistent across the industry. After rework or second-stage assembly, manual cleaning is difficult to guarantee that all residues have been removed and no contamination exists that may impact function or reliability.

Most problems occur when a customer decides that the no-clean process he has been accepting is not as clean as he would like and stipulates cleaning. Often this change in the process is not well thought through. This results in failure or cosmetically disappointing board assemblies.

To achieve and demonstrate the best possible result, engineers and production staff need to work as a team to define a process where cleaning material and flux residues are compatible (Figure 1 shows a possible consequence of not doing so). Finally, to achieve consistency, training members of staff, engineers, contract assemblers and possibly customers to complete the operation is very important. Design engineers should consider the circuit design, defining critical areas for special attention to maintain their electrical performance.

Figure 1. Possible results of a poorly defined and introduced process.
Figure 1. Possible results of a poorly defined and introduced process.

Ideally, disposable gloves should be worn when working with soldering and cleaning materials in a rework area. Handle the board by its edges wherever possible, even when using gloves. If cotton gloves are used to reduce perspiration, they should be changed regularly. Remember that ESD-control wrist straps are worn on the skin, not over gloves, so fit the strap before the gloves.

During rework or manual assembly, applying flux or paste to pads or terminations on components (particularly area array packages) is best practice as it will leave minimum residues to remove from the PCB. Flooding the board surface, using a brush or dispensing bottle to apply liquid flux or gel should be avoided during rework – it is just more mess to clean.

Figure 2. SIR test board assembly used by the author to test cleaning reliability.
Figure 2. SIR test board assembly used by the author to test cleaning reliability.

After rework, modification or second-stage assembly, cleaning may need to be considered or specifically required. Ideally a no-clean flux, gel or solder paste which has been tested on site should be used to avoid the need to clean selected areas. This would be agreed in advance with a customer - often customers don’t like dirty PCBs.

If manual cleaning is conducted, every effort should be made to use materials or application methods that result in the minimum residues from both flux and cleaning process in a defined process sequence. The cleaning material used must be compatible with the boards, components and most importantly, the residues to be removed.

The remaining residues from the soldering materials must be totally soluble in the cleaning material, and this requires pre-production trials and some form of reliability assessment like SIR (surface insulation resistance) or ion chromatography. ROSE testing is not adequate for confirming reliability. ROSE testing is a process control test often used as part of an evaluation process; it is not used to assess reliability of a product.

Suppliers of the cleaning chemistry will normally outline the best methods of cleaning residues from PCBs, or help you develop a procedure like the one outlined in our online webinar presentation.

Manual cleaning methods should apply the minimum solution to clean the board, components and under the components where possible. Any brushes should not shed any bristles, and can be natural fibre or alternative to avoid static generation or mechanical abrasion to the solder joints or solder mask.

There is a benefit with some synthetic white bristles as they also show up excess residues due to poor housekeeping. Any brushes used should be changed regularly. A combination solvent and a self-priming brush to control the amount of solution used, as well as providing the mechanical agitation, can be beneficial. The methods do rely on the skills of the staff in using the tools and they are the best people to help define the process.

A board assembly should ideally be lifted and angled (See Figure 3) so that the cleaning material can run off the board on to an absorbent sheet. The direction of cleaning should be selected to minimise the cleaning solution running on to other parts of the board. It is also possible to use a dry/wet wipe around the component termination to be cleaned to capture any run-off from residues.

Figure 3. Board at angle while cleaning chips, and wipe placed under the board.
Figure 3. Board at angle while cleaning chips, and wipe placed under the board.

Placing a dry or wet wipe over the component area while brushing the terminations through the wipe can also work well (see Figure 4). The flux and cleaner is absorbed by the wipe and controls the run-off during cleaning and blow-off. The wipes selected will need to be more robust to avoid breakup during cleaning, but still be absorbent.

Figure 4. Cleaning through or around QFPs with wipes.
Figure 4. Cleaning through or around QFPs with wipes.

When cleaning and rinsing is complete and the flux residues appear to be removed, a non-shredding wet wipe can remove any cleaning drying/evaporation marks separately. Drying marks can be seen on the surface of the solder mask, which is another reason to specify the type of mask at the design stage - most engineers never do. Take care around component terminations to avoid damage as wipes can snag and leave fibres on the board, particularly on conventional through-hole leads.

It is best to repeat the operation with fresh cleaner as a final rinse, and wipe the surface using one of the methods outlined. Cleaning is best performed after the soldering or rework process. The residues tend to be more soluble this way than leaving them for a long period of time after soldering.

Finally, use a low-pressure air gun to remove any cleaner from under or around components and connectors, placing a dry/wet wipe on the opposite sides of the component to capture any fluid displaced by the air flow. Again, angle the board so any remaining contamination drains to the edge of the board and the wipe away from other components. If fluid is still present it may require a final wipe with a lint-free cloth.

It is good practice to allow the board assembly to stand vertically on a rack after cleaning, if possible with the reworked area at the bottom. The board assembly may be placed in a low temperature, air circulated oven. It would also be normal practice to bake board assemblies before any conformal coating process is applied, but this would be at a higher temperature as recommended by the coating supplier.

Never rush the cleaning, drying and conformal coating steps as some cleaners will react with coatings, preventing them from fully curing. The coating will fall off and in the worst case produce corrosion. Make sure that any wipes and old brushes are placed in the appropriate disposal container. In the case of brushes make sure they are cleaned after use to prevent them being clogged with residues or use disposable brushes.

Further information on cleaning is available in IPC-CH-65B, the Cleaning Handbook and IPC specifications like IPC 7711-7721. As with any assembly process, training staff in good practice, the materials and methods to be used and inspection for residues after manual cleaning is recommended. Any training should be included in any rework or hand soldering course and be recorded on staff records. Training should also be conducted for test engineers who often do touch-up.

Any manual cleaning must be developed as a process on the shop floor and not just adopted historically. The material compatibility, cleaning methods and acceptance criteria are defined by engineers with the support of production staff to assess the practical methods. Production

staff are invaluable to test and try new methods and materials, or when flux or paste are changed.

Just like any other process, engineer it or you will just have failures and customer returns.

For more information visit www.bobwillis.co.uk





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Engineering in a world that cannot assume connectivity
Technews Publishing Editor's Choice News
Across industrial automation, networking, and defence systems, engineers are rediscovering the importance of resilience and autonomy in an increasingly connected world.

Read more...
Designing IoT devices for deterministic LPWAN environments
Editor's Choice Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
Built on Ultra Narrow Band communication technology, the Sigfox network focuses on low power, wide area M2M connectivity rather than maximising data throughput.

Read more...
Driving excellence in electronics manufacturing
Jemstech Editor's Choice Manufacturing / Production Technology, Hardware & Services
Jemstech’s reputation for disciplined execution and client-focused service has earned it strong loyalty from companies operating in demanding industries.

Read more...
In sync with the line
Testerion Editor's Choice Manufacturing / Production Technology, Hardware & Services
In modern SMT lines, stencil printing must meet two requirements at the same time: it has to ensure a reproducible solder paste volume, while adhering to the specified line cycle time.

Read more...
Resilient navigation in warfare: The role of non-GNSS
Etion Create Editor's Choice
Alternative navigation methods are essential for maintaining operational capability when satellite signals are unreliable or unavailable.

Read more...
Quectel’s RG255C-NA and RM255C-GL accelerate 5G RedCap adoption
iCorp Technologies Editor's Choice Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
Quectel’s RG255C-NA and RM255C-GL modules represent a strategic move into this fast-growing segment, delivering Sub-6 GHz 5G connectivity optimised for mid-tier IoT applications.

Read more...
SDRs – Which RF architecture should you choose?
RFiber Solutions Editor's Choice Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
There are several common methods of implementing SDR architectures. This paper discusses which is best when meeting a specific need.

Read more...
Surviving the extremes: Understanding shock and vibration in MEMS sensors
Altron Arrow Editor's Choice Test & Measurement
By considering factors such as mechanical headroom, damping, and system-level robustness, designers can ensure that the chosen sensor not only survives, but performs reliably over time.

Read more...
A two-stage approach to super-wide input voltage range DC-DC converters
RFiber Solutions Editor's Choice
Teaser: In addition to handling the various input voltage ranges required, the SynQor line of InQor DC-DC converters are fully encased and ruggedised to handle the harsh environments that often accompany systems that have such challenging technical requirements.

Read more...
From the editor's desk: Engineering the future
Technews Publishing Editor's Choice
As we welcome the first issue of Dataweek in a new year, it is an exciting time to be part of the electronics community, especially for our readers. The pace of change across our industry continues to accelerate, reshaping how we design, build, and interact with technology.

Read more...









While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd | All Rights Reserved