Editor's Choice


Building blocks for IIoT edge nodes

31 May 2024 Editor's Choice

Early-stage IoT concepts defined sensors that linked directly to the cloud. However, as vertical industries started seriously evaluating IoT architectures to extract greater business value, it became clear that this one-size-fits-all approach was impractical for various reasons.

Consider just a few of the implications of a cloud-first model in Industrial IoT (IIoT) deployments:

• Data and device security: The potential of insecure endpoints communicating directly with the cloud meant hackers could exploit vulnerabilities to access sensitive industrial networks.

• Runaway networking costs: Sensor-to-server data transmissions (especially over public networks) can be so costly they prohibit scaling to the thousands of nodes required by many IIoT deployments. Add large volumes of measurement and status data generated by industrial sensors, and network congestion, packet delays, and inefficient bandwidth usage abound.

• Power consumption of always-on sensor nodes: Remote sensor nodes require continuous connection to the network and an energy source. This is particularly challenging in remote settings like mining and agriculture, where limited access can mean replacing batteries or troubleshooting networks, costs thousands of dollars.

New classes of secure hardware, networking, and battery technology emerged from these challenges to redefine how IoT systems were architected, and industrial devices were designed. The technology revolution began by combining security and energy efficiency in edge-centric silicon.

The low-power foundations of IoT processors

Introduced as real-world IoT requirements were being defined in 2009, Arm Cortex-M0 CPUs offered the ability to operate solely on 16-bit ‘thumb’ instructions rather than the 32-bit instructions required by its predecessors.

Thumb instructions’ compact encoding method enables code density improvements of roughly 30% on processors like the Cortex-M0, which has a cascading effect on memory usage (lower), die sizes (smaller), power consumption (less), and ultimately cost (reduced).

Fast-forward to today and devices based on the Arm Cortex-M33 architecture feature thumb instructions and built-in hardware security via features like TrustZone.

TrustZone delivers hardware-based data and device security through a secure root of trust (RoT). When combined with the energy efficiency of Cortex-M33 CPU cores, TrustZone creates secure, battery-powered IoT devices that can operate for extended periods in remote settings. It also doesn’t detract from CPU performance, as Cortex-M33 processors deliver an impressive 1,5 DMIPS/MHz and 4,09 CoreMark/MHz for handling complex tasks at the edge to reduce reliance on centralised cloud processing.

From the beginning of IoT rollouts through to today, Cortex-M-class chips continue to deliver possibilities for various IoT use cases.

The rise of LPWAN

The success of energy-efficient IIoT edge nodes is not only a result of their host processor but also how they connect. In the late 2000s, the advent of 4G technology signalled the decline of earlier networks, highlighting the need for a new low-power, wide-area networking (LPWAN) technology that facilitates long-range communication for IoT devices.

LPWAN technologies such as LoRa have emerged as an appealing method for linking battery-powered IoT devices to networks. Its long-range capabilities and low energy consumption make it an ideal choice for IIoT applications like asset tracking, environmental monitoring, industrial automation, smart agriculture, and smart cities.

Today’s LoRa transceiver modules facilitate LPWAN communications over distances of up to 15 km, while consuming approximately 40 mA of current during transmission. Typically, LoRa modules interface with host processors like Cortex-M-class devices through UART, and communicate via ASCII commands, streamlining integration with IoT devices.

These transceivers pair with sub-GHz antennas that meet the frequency requirements of LPWAN networks, many of which are available in compact SMD form factors that fit the space constraints of edge devices. In addition to supporting protocols like LoRaWAN, some of these antennas also support short-range wireless technologies like Wi-Fi, Zigbee, and Bluetooth to enable the creation of backhaul-enabled wireless sensor networks.

Lithium battery technology advances for IoT edge nodes

Thanks to the availability of secure, energy-efficient computing technology and LPWAN networking, the idea of battery-powered IIoT sensor nodes became a reality. The IIoT industry embraced the concept of battery-powered sensors, and demand for dependable, high-density power sources increased.

Lithium-ion batteries emerged as the preferred choice for powering these sensors, thanks to consistent power density and reliability improvements. These advancements yielded the ability for IoT devices to operate for extended periods on a single battery charge – a critical requirement for many agriculture, mining, and industrial applications. Meanwhile, the improved reliability of lithium-ion battery technology led to reductions in maintenance and operational expenses, while ensuring uninterrupted data collection and communication.

A Qoitech study on the compatibility of LoRaWAN technology and coin cell batteries highlighted the pairing’s potential in enduring, low-power wireless IoT sensor nodes [www.qoitech.com/blog/lorawan-iot-coin-cell-battery]. In the study, researchers tested the performance of coin cell batteries using a battery-profiling tool. The tool measured a 40 mA (peak current) LoRaWAN power profile with an exit condition that triggered when the voltage dropped below 0,6 V or 2 V. The study provides insightful results, revealing disparities in coin cell performance among manufacturers that are particularly evident at higher current levels. It also proved that CR2032 and CR2450 are viable options for powering LoRaWAN devices.

This harmony between LPWAN technology and high-density lithium-ion batteries has helped propel the IIoT landscape, enabling new energy-efficient wireless sensor nodes. Lithium coin cell batteries have emerged as the go-to power source for these devices due to their compact size, impressive energy density, and extended lifespan. The availability of diverse lithium coin cell battery options – available in various chemistries and configurations tailored to specific IoT applications – gives developers freedom of choice.

Future of technology for the Industrial IoT

Recent IIoT technology advancements have not been limited to the edge; they’ve also extended to the control layer. These improvements have led to multicore systems-on-chips (SoCs) featuring multiple CPU or graphics cores, integrated neural network accelerators, and dedicated IP blocks for executing analogue, security, and other workloads.

These high-performance chipsets almost always contain multiple high-speed I/O interfaces that streamline system integration in a number of deployment contexts. They are also candidates for embedded virtualisation using technologies like hypervisors and single-root I/O virtualisation (SR-IOV) that partition on-chip cores, memory, and I/O resources. As a result, multiple mixed-criticality workloads can run and execute simultaneously on a single physical processor, maximising resource utilisation, and reducing overall size, weight, power consumption, and cost versus multiprocessor solutions.

Elsewhere, networking standards like Ethernet Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) are rising. TSN introduces deterministic communication capabilities from the control layer to sensor nodes and enterprise systems for fine-grained timing control, precision device management, and task-oriented workflows like virtual programmable logic controllers (vPLCs). The convergence of these technologies is expanding functionality as IIoT nodes continue to evolve.

The evolution of IIoT technology building blocks started at the far edge, and continues today at the control layer. For instance, the emergence of multicore SoCs with integrated accelerators, and the adoption of networking standards like Ethernet TSN, have paved the way for improved device management and the implementation of containerised enterprise applications.

These innovations will undoubtedly continue to play a key role in defining the future of IIoT.


Credit(s)



Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Engineering in a world that cannot assume connectivity
Technews Publishing Editor's Choice News
Across industrial automation, networking, and defence systems, engineers are rediscovering the importance of resilience and autonomy in an increasingly connected world.

Read more...
Designing IoT devices for deterministic LPWAN environments
Editor's Choice Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
Built on Ultra Narrow Band communication technology, the Sigfox network focuses on low power, wide area M2M connectivity rather than maximising data throughput.

Read more...
Driving excellence in electronics manufacturing
Jemstech Editor's Choice Manufacturing / Production Technology, Hardware & Services
Jemstech’s reputation for disciplined execution and client-focused service has earned it strong loyalty from companies operating in demanding industries.

Read more...
In sync with the line
Testerion Editor's Choice Manufacturing / Production Technology, Hardware & Services
In modern SMT lines, stencil printing must meet two requirements at the same time: it has to ensure a reproducible solder paste volume, while adhering to the specified line cycle time.

Read more...
Resilient navigation in warfare: The role of non-GNSS
Etion Create Editor's Choice
Alternative navigation methods are essential for maintaining operational capability when satellite signals are unreliable or unavailable.

Read more...
Quectel’s RG255C-NA and RM255C-GL accelerate 5G RedCap adoption
iCorp Technologies Editor's Choice Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
Quectel’s RG255C-NA and RM255C-GL modules represent a strategic move into this fast-growing segment, delivering Sub-6 GHz 5G connectivity optimised for mid-tier IoT applications.

Read more...
SDRs – Which RF architecture should you choose?
RFiber Solutions Editor's Choice Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
There are several common methods of implementing SDR architectures. This paper discusses which is best when meeting a specific need.

Read more...
Surviving the extremes: Understanding shock and vibration in MEMS sensors
Altron Arrow Editor's Choice Test & Measurement
By considering factors such as mechanical headroom, damping, and system-level robustness, designers can ensure that the chosen sensor not only survives, but performs reliably over time.

Read more...
N-channel power MOSFETs
TRX Electronics Power Electronics / Power Management
The TSM2N7002 series from Taiwan Semiconductor are logic-level N-channel power MOSFETs designed with low drain-source on-state resistance, reducing conduction losses and improving efficiency in switching applications.

Read more...
A two-stage approach to super-wide input voltage range DC-DC converters
RFiber Solutions Editor's Choice
Teaser: In addition to handling the various input voltage ranges required, the SynQor line of InQor DC-DC converters are fully encased and ruggedised to handle the harsh environments that often accompany systems that have such challenging technical requirements.

Read more...









While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd | All Rights Reserved