Computer/Embedded Technology


10 issues to consider before installing industrial Ethernet - Part III

17 July 2002 Computer/Embedded Technology

After having a look at speed and distance issues in Part II, we now turn our attention to a consideration between hubs vs switches.

Some hubs and converters are shown here
Some hubs and converters are shown here

Repeating hubs

Modern Ethernet networks must be wired in a star topology utilising either twisted-pair or fibre-optic cabling. Links, consisting of only two devices, are established between a single Ethernet device and a port on a hub. Hubs are multiport devices usually capable of having 4, 8 or 12 ports. Hubs can be cascaded with a hub-to-hub connection.

Repeating hubs must conform to the requirements for IEEE-802.3 repeater units. These requirements include preamble regeneration, symmetry and amplitude compensation. Repeaters must re-time signals so that jitter, introduced by transceivers and cabling, does not accumulate over multiple segments. These devices detect runt packets and react to collisions by generating a JAM signal. They automatically partition jabbering ports to maintain network operability.

A point to remember: there is a limit to the number of hubs that can be cascaded. Ethernet's contention-based station arbitration method requires that all stations note if a collision has occurred on the network. The limit of this detection is called the collision domain, and it restricts the network's overall size. Exceeding the collision domain by introducing too many repeating hubs creates an unstable network with lost messages and generally poor performance. However, on a properly designed network, repeating hubs are simple to understand and use, not to mention very effective.

Repeating hubs have been criticised because they do not improve the determinism of Ethernet. With contention-based networks, such as Ethernet, it is impossible to predict the amount of time it takes for a station-to-station message when collisions occur since the backoff time is variable. A potential solution to this problem is to avoid collisions altogether.

Industrial automation systems frequently utilise master/slave protocols where a response from a slave only occurs after a command is initiated by the master. This type of protocol tends to limit collisions and thereby improves determinism. Repeating hubs will function quite well in this situation.

Media converters

Another class of physical devices are the media converters. Sometimes called transceivers, these devices convert one type of media to another. The most important conversion is from twisted-pair cable to fibre optics. Since some hubs do not have any fibre-optic ports, media converters are required in order to support fibre-optic cable in a network. Media converters should appear to the network as transparent devices. They are two-port devices that do not store frames or detect collisions. They only convert the signals sent over one medium to compatible signals over another.

Switching hubs

It is possible to replace repeating hubs with switching hubs and achieve higher network performance. Unlike repeating hubs, which are physical layer devices, the switching hub is actually a bridge that connects two data links together. By doing so, collision domains terminate at each switch port. Therefore, adding a switch doubles the possible geographic limit of the network. Switches can be cascaded for an even larger network.

Switches are much more complex than repeating hubs. Each twisted-pair port automatically negotiates with its attached device the data rate for that port, be it 10 or 100 Mbps. The flow control mechanism is also negotiated. For full-duplex segments, the PAUSE scheme is used. For half-duplex segments, the backpressure approach is used. The switch learns the port locations of Ethernet devices by reading complete Ethernet frames and observing source addresses. The switch then creates and maintains a table of source addresses and corresponding port assignments. From that time on, traffic is restricted to only those ports involved in a transmission. This allows for improved throughput since simultaneous transmissions can be initiated on those ports without activity. Table values are aged to automatically accommodate changes to field wiring.

If a broadcast, multicast or unicast transmission to an unknown destination is received on a port, all other ports are flooded with the transmission.

In Figure 1 we have the same identical network as the preceding example except that all the repeating hubs have been replaced by switching hubs. The result is that instead of one overall collision domain we have several collision domains allowing us to have a much greater overall network diameter. Within each collision domain you must follow the same rules as stated earlier. You could add repeating hubs connected to switch ports. You could also make it easy on yourself by only specifying switching hubs and not repeating hubs. If you do that, the maximum twisted-pair segment length remains at 100 m; however, switches can be cascaded with little concern. If you want the same flexibility using fibre optics, we need to address the half-/full-duplex issue first.

Figure 1. Because switches break the network into multiple collision domains, the physical size of the network is virtually unlimited
Figure 1. Because switches break the network into multiple collision domains, the physical size of the network is virtually unlimited

Repeating hub vs switching hub debate

From the above discussion it would seem like switching hubs are an all-round best choice over repeating hubs. However, repeating hubs have their advantages. Repeating hubs are simple to understand and you can connect a network analyser to any transmission. A 'flood' port on the switch is required in order to observe all traffic on the network. Switching hubs are bridges that store and forward complete Ethernet frames, creating a degree of data latency. Cascading switches aggravate the problem. Therefore, you can see that repeating hubs, as well as switching hubs, have their place with industrial Ethernet.

Part IV will continue in a subsequent issue (10 September, 2002) and will look at half-duplex and full-duplex issues.



Credit(s)



Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Solid-state drive based on QLC technology
29 April 2020, Altron Arrow , Computer/Embedded Technology
Micron Technology announced new Micron 5210 ION enterprise SATA SSD capacity and features, solidifying its leadership in QLC (quad-level cell) technology volume production. The world’s first QLC solid-state ...

Read more...
Expansion boards for Cherry Blossom
29 May 2020, Altron Arrow , Computer/Embedded Technology
Altron Arrow’s locally developed Cherry Blossom development board has been put through its paces in various companies that are innovating through technology and user testimonials suggest that it has the ...

Read more...
Developer kit for AI edge devices
29 May 2020, Altron Arrow , Computer/Embedded Technology
The NVIDIA Jetson Xavier NX developer kit includes a power-efficient, compact Jetson Xavier NX module for AI edge devices. It benefits from new cloud-native support and accelerates the NVIDIA software ...

Read more...
NXP streamlines development with Microsoft Azure RTOS
29 April 2020, EBV Electrolink , Computer/Embedded Technology
NXP Semiconductors expanded its partnership with Microsoft to bring Microsoft Azure RTOS, a comprehensive real-time operating system (RTOS), to a broader range of processing solutions from its EdgeVerse ...

Read more...
‘World’s smallest’ single-board computer
25 March 2020, Centurion Micro Electronics , Computer/Embedded Technology
AMD has been producing x86 type CPUs since the eighties. Over the years it has had numerous CPU families and in 2017 released its latest Zen Core family and branded the CPUs ‘Ryzen’. In 2020 AMD released ...

Read more...
‘World’s smallest’ single-board computer
29 April 2020, Centurion Micro Electronics , Computer/Embedded Technology
AMD has been producing x86 type CPUs since the eighties. Over the years it has had numerous CPU families and in 2017 released its latest Zen Core family and branded the CPUs ‘Ryzen’. In 2020 AMD released ...

Read more...
XMC board ideal for waveform generation
29 April 2020, Rugged Interconnect Technologies , Computer/Embedded Technology
Pentek announced its most recent addition to the Jade architecture family, the Jade Model 71871, a four-channel 1,25 GHz D/A converter XMC for RF and IF waveform generation. The Model 71871 combines ...

Read more...
Mini PCIe reference design for MIL-STD-1553
25 March 2020, ASIC Design Services , Computer/Embedded Technology
Holt Integrated Circuits introduced a new dual-channel development kit and complete reference design based on the popular HI-2130LBx MIL-STD-1553 fully integrated terminals. The kit includes a full-size ...

Read more...
Compact fanless PC for harsh environments
25 March 2020, Brandwagon Distribution , Computer/Embedded Technology
Compulab’s Airtop3 is a ruggedised, small-form-factor fanless IoT edge server with optimised performance, features and cooling. The ruggedised aluminium case is specially designed to generate natural ...

Read more...
AI cards optimised for vision processing
25 March 2020, Vepac Electronics , Computer/Embedded Technology
AI (artificial intelligence) is taking the world of IoT by storm. While many aspects of AI are computing- and resource-intensive, others rely on small and swift devices that can quickly deliver results. ...

Read more...