Editor's Choice


Here is what we learnt from three supply chain crises

31 July 2026 Editor's Choice

If you have spent more than fifteen years in electronics procurement or manufacturing, you have already been through this before. The extended lead times, the pricing volatility, the components that were available last quarter and are now on a thirty-week backorder. The frantic supplier calls. The BOM lines that will not close.

The global electronics component market has a rhythm that experienced procurement managers recognise. Roughly every seven to ten years, a crisis event, whether geopolitical, economic, or environmental, compresses global supply at exactly the moment demand refuses to slow down.

If you are mid-career in this industry, you have likely navigated three or four of them. Seven Labs has navigated every one alongside its clients, and each crisis taught us something we have built permanently into how we work.

Lesson one: Alternatives save lines

The 2011 shortage hit fast and hit hard. Components that were on standard lead times disappeared from legitimate channels almost overnight, and manufacturers who could not find alternatives quickly paid for it in production delays.

What we did was go and find them. Not through grey market channels, but through the supplier relationships and accredited networks we had spent years building. When a preferred component was not available, we identified compliant alternatives, validated them against the customer’s application, and got the BOM moving again.

That process, done well, is not a quick fix you can improvise. It is a capability that has to be built before you need it. Seven Labs has been building this capability ever since, and it is one of the first things clients call us for when the standard channels run dry.


Reactive procurement is always the most expensive kind. The window between “this is coming” and “this is here” is shorter than it feels.


Lesson two: Manufacturers who act early win

The trade disruption of 2018 to 2019 was different in character because it came with warning signs. Pricing pressure and supply shifts were visible months before they landed fully. The manufacturers who read those signals and acted on them by adjusting schedules, locking in pricing, and getting ahead of the curve came through in far better shape than those who waited to see how things developed.

Our job during that period was to make sure our clients were in the first group. We flagged what we were seeing in the market, helped clients model the impact on their BOMs, and worked with them to order ahead, while pricing and availability still made sense.

Most procurement teams are too consumed with managing the present to act on what they can see approaching. We took that off their plate. The lesson it reinforced is simple: if we know what your plans are, we can accommodate. If we do not, we can only react, and reaction always costs more than preparation.


The quality of the outcome in a crisis is almost entirely determined by the quality of the relationship leading up to it.


Lesson three: Relationships you have before the crisis determine everything

COVID was the test that showed most clearly what partnership actually means under pressure. When the supply chain collapsed and shortages hit across the board, the manufacturers who weathered the disruption most successfully were not necessarily the largest or the best funded; they were the ones with the right partner in their corner.

For the clients who trusted us with their supply chains, we went further than the standard service model allows. We sourced hard-to-find components and genuine alternatives when the obvious channels were empty. We worked alongside clients on forward forecasting, helping them secure allocation when it became available, even when their own cash flow was under pressure. We offered flexible terms on both payment and delivery, because we knew that holding clients to rigid terms in a crisis is not a partnership. It is just transactional.

The clients we could help most effectively were the ones we already knew well. The ones whose BOMs we understood, whose production rhythms we were close to, and whose upcoming projects we had visibility on. That existing depth meant we could move faster, source smarter, and do more. The relationship before the crisis determined how much we could do during it.

What is different this time

The current disruption follows the same pattern. The clients who will navigate it best are the ones already working with a partner who understands their requirements. What is genuinely different now is speed. Six years ago, scanning supplier networks, identifying alternatives, and modelling pricing scenarios required significant manual effort. Today, Seven Labs’ AI-powered systems do in minutes what once took hours. BOM analysis, alternative component identification, market pricing intelligence, supply forecasting – all faster, all more accurate, and all available to clients as a standard part of how we work. The instinct is the same. The tools are considerably sharper.

The case for starting now

The truth about crisis procurement support is that it requires trust, and trust takes time. A distributor who does not know your BOM, your production rhythm, or your quality standards cannot help you effectively when things get tight. That relationship has to exist before you need it.

The best time to put Seven Labs to the test is now. Send us your BOM. We will turn around a competitive quote, flag any components to watch regarding lead time, and show you what our forecasting capability looks like in practice. Try kitting on one product line and measure the time your team gets back. On cost: kitting is not more expensive. Because of the supplier terms we carry, the component pricing is competitive.

What changes is everything around the component: the admin, the checking, the chasing, the errors. That is where the real cost lies, and that is where the savings are.

Sourced at the best price, kitted, batched and delivered when you need it. Three crises have shown us what that promise is worth. The next one will come. The manufacturers who have already built the right partnerships will not be scrambling when it does.


Credit(s)



Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Locate underground cable faults faster with the Fluke AF2082 A-Frame
Comtest Editor's Choice Test & Measurement
Underground cable faults can lead to costly downtime, service disruptions, and extensive excavation if the fault location is uncertain. The AF2082 simplifies this process by guiding operators directly to the fault point.

Read more...
The new reality of PCB material supply
Jemstech Editor's Choice Manufacturing / Production Technology, Hardware & Services
How resilient manufacturing strategies are helping OEMs navigate a changing global supply chain.

Read more...
Strengthening local electronics manufacturing through investment and innovation
Microtronix Manufacturing Editor's Choice Manufacturing / Production Technology, Hardware & Services
Microtronix South Africa cements its commitment to local manufacturing with ongoing investments in production capacity, skills development, and job creation.

Read more...
From the editor's desk: Local can be international
Technews Publishing Editor's Choice News
Welcome to the July 2026 issue of Dataweek. As you can see from this introduction, Dataweek’s regular editor, Peter Howells, is on extended leave and I am filling the void in his editor’s column – hopefully without being too boring.

Read more...
Solving South African power problems with locally built intelligence
Editor's Choice Power Electronics / Power Management
Smart metering infrastructure in South Africa remains patchy. The rollout has been slow, coverage is inconsistent, and for the most part, granular per-unit measurement simply does not exist.

Read more...
From the editor's desk: The art of measuring the truth
Technews Publishing Editor's Choice News
All electronic measurements are a lie. The trick is making the lie as small as possible.

Read more...
Engineering for failure: why resilient telemetry matters more than perfect connectivity
Editor's Choice Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
One of the biggest assumptions in modern tracking systems is that connectivity will always be available. From an engineering perspective, this creates an interesting problem.

Read more...
Lesley Havenga: Building partnerships for Africa’s electronics future
Editor's Choice News
As Würth Electronik expands its footprint across South Africa and the broader sub-Saharan region, Havenga’s blend of manufacturing expertise, supply chain knowledge, and people-centred leadership appears well suited to the task.

Read more...
Generating negative voltages from a positive supply
Altron Arrow Editor's Choice Passive Components
It is common for IoT devices, industrial sensors, meters, and medical equipment to require both a positive and negative voltage, and this article explains the options available to produce a negative rail from a positive rail supply.

Read more...
PEAK’s first automotive Ethernet solution
Industrial Data Xchange (IDX) Editor's Choice Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
The PAE-Media Converter is a robust and compact device designed to connect Automotive Ethernet (100BASE-T1 or 1000BASE-T1) with standard Ethernet (100BASE-TX or 1000BASE-T) networks.

Read more...









While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd | All Rights Reserved