Editor's Choice


Why you don’t take ‘touch’ for granted

30 September 2020 Editor's Choice

The key criteria for choosing the right sensor control IC


Adilson Jacob.

Touch has become an incredibly intuitive way for people to interact with high-tech devices. In just a few short years after the first smartphones hit the shelves, it seems the whole world is happily tapping, swiping, pinching and flicking on phones and tablets, in stores, at work, and on the road. We expect every response to be precise and instant, as cool and glassy smooth as the surface of the device itself.

What factors should I consider when designing a touch user interface?

Designers know that this is not always easy to achieve. The processes involved with creating and measuring the capacitance changes that describe the type and location of each touch on the screen are subject to numerous challenges such as electrical noise both inside and outside the system, humidity in the environment, and unintentional user gestures close to the screen.


On the other hand, ensuring electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of the end product is especially challenging for equipment that contains a touchscreen. Whereas passing EMC testing calls for immunity to external electrical disturbances, the touchscreen relies on detecting and measuring disturbances to interpret the user’s wishes.

Achieving great touch sensitivity and fast response, while preventing unwanted signals causing spurious responses, calls for careful engineering.

Why is touch performance difficult to optimise?

Unfortunately, after many cumulative man-years of touchscreen development experience, there is no ‘default setting’, no universal parameters that can be simply programmed to make the touchscreen of an embedded project just work. Every system is different: there are multiple touchscreen technologies such as glass-film or glass-glass construction with single or double ITO (SITO/DITO) layers; the size of the screen and the cover-lens material and thickness influence touch response; and designers may have only a limited notion of the environment in which the screen will be used – whether outdoors or indoors, whether there will be high humidity or likelihood of water splashes, or other potential sources of interference.


The interactions between the display and the touch controller are critical to ensuring a great touch experience for the user. It’s probably fair to say that most projects consider the touch display before the controller. The concept for the product is often predominantly about look and feel, and the display size is often determined by application constraints, as are decisions about the cover-lens, such as the thickness, glass or polycarbonate, any vandal-resistant treatments, and anti-glare/anti-reflective coating.

How should I choose a touch controller?

With so many decisions already made or difficult to change, the challenge to identify and integrate a suitable touch controller – and optimise the firmware – can demand specialist skills and expertise.


Typical touch control chips on the market today are microcontroller-based ICs that integrate circuitry needed to stimulate the sensor and capture measurable responses. This typically includes a high-voltage charge pump controller, regulator, and multi-channel capacitance-to-digital converter that takes care of driving and sensing the capacitive-touch electrodes.

Not one shoe size fits all

Selecting the right touch IC to enhance your product’s performance cannot be a generic process. It needs to be as individual as each customer and tailored to their particular product’s application needs. This level of service doesn’t cost the earth. It is certainly not as costly as selecting the wrong touch IC, starting the whole design process again, or failing EMC testing.

Too often companies are having to take corrective action. In all instances they have actually added cost by extending their development time, doubling resources and investing twice, and not entering the market as quickly as intended.


Selecting the best controller for a given application can depend on factors such as cost and availability as well as performance. At Anders, we have experience with various types of controllers from several vendors, spanning a wide price/performance spectrum. A low-cost controller can often be tuned to deliver satisfactory performance, particularly with small display sizes and when the operating environment is relatively benign. With increasing display size, and as the electrical and electromagnetic environment becomes more challenging, a higher-performing controller is usually needed to achieve a suitable balance of signal detection and noise rejection to ensure robust and reliable touch detection in all operating conditions.

Table 1 shows an example of two very differing applications and the requirements for the touch IC.

Table 1. Touch IC requirements for two different applications.

Bolstering the familiarity that comes with the experience of working with various types of controllers on a wide range of customers’ projects, our preferred suppliers often present training workshops to introduce new products. These provide a valuable source of hands-on practice with the latest devices and techniques for touch optimisation. This way, we continue to expand the range of tools at our disposal to help make your touchscreen perform at its best.

The new product you’re developing right now is in demand and looks amazing, just as you designed it. Great touch is a critical part of the user-experience mix but can be the toughest aspect to solve.

Although not easy, with the right help you can get there. Let’s start the conversation.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Locate underground cable faults faster with the Fluke AF2082 A-Frame
Comtest Editor's Choice Test & Measurement
Underground cable faults can lead to costly downtime, service disruptions, and extensive excavation if the fault location is uncertain. The AF2082 simplifies this process by guiding operators directly to the fault point.

Read more...
Here is what we learnt from three supply chain crises
Seven Labs Technology Editor's Choice
Component crises are not random events. They follow a pattern. After fifteen years and three major disruptions, Seven Labs knows exactly what that pattern demands, and what it takes to keep production lines moving.

Read more...
The new reality of PCB material supply
Jemstech Editor's Choice Manufacturing / Production Technology, Hardware & Services
How resilient manufacturing strategies are helping OEMs navigate a changing global supply chain.

Read more...
Strengthening local electronics manufacturing through investment and innovation
Microtronix Manufacturing Editor's Choice Manufacturing / Production Technology, Hardware & Services
Microtronix South Africa cements its commitment to local manufacturing with ongoing investments in production capacity, skills development, and job creation.

Read more...
From the editor's desk: Local can be international
Technews Publishing Editor's Choice News
Welcome to the July 2026 issue of Dataweek. As you can see from this introduction, Dataweek’s regular editor, Peter Howells, is on extended leave and I am filling the void in his editor’s column – hopefully without being too boring.

Read more...
Solving South African power problems with locally built intelligence
Editor's Choice Power Electronics / Power Management
Smart metering infrastructure in South Africa remains patchy. The rollout has been slow, coverage is inconsistent, and for the most part, granular per-unit measurement simply does not exist.

Read more...
From the editor's desk: The art of measuring the truth
Technews Publishing Editor's Choice News
All electronic measurements are a lie. The trick is making the lie as small as possible.

Read more...
Engineering for failure: why resilient telemetry matters more than perfect connectivity
Editor's Choice Telecoms, Datacoms, Wireless, IoT
One of the biggest assumptions in modern tracking systems is that connectivity will always be available. From an engineering perspective, this creates an interesting problem.

Read more...
Lesley Havenga: Building partnerships for Africa’s electronics future
Editor's Choice News
As Würth Electronik expands its footprint across South Africa and the broader sub-Saharan region, Havenga’s blend of manufacturing expertise, supply chain knowledge, and people-centred leadership appears well suited to the task.

Read more...
Generating negative voltages from a positive supply
Altron Arrow Editor's Choice Passive Components
It is common for IoT devices, industrial sensors, meters, and medical equipment to require both a positive and negative voltage, and this article explains the options available to produce a negative rail from a positive rail supply.

Read more...









While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd | All Rights Reserved